Taxpayer – ATO Ogratuit http://atoogratuit.com/ Fri, 17 Sep 2021 22:32:49 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://atoogratuit.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/icon-5-150x150.png Taxpayer – ATO Ogratuit http://atoogratuit.com/ 32 32 Surprise: Ivanka, Eric and Donald Trump Jr. still laugh at US taxpayers https://atoogratuit.com/surprise-ivanka-eric-and-donald-trump-jr-still-laugh-at-us-taxpayers/ https://atoogratuit.com/surprise-ivanka-eric-and-donald-trump-jr-still-laugh-at-us-taxpayers/#respond Fri, 17 Sep 2021 20:55:41 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/surprise-ivanka-eric-and-donald-trump-jr-still-laugh-at-us-taxpayers/ During the four years that Donald trump served as president, he swindled millions of taxpayer dollars by running official business at his properties, where the incarnate con artist made sure to charge everything from golf carts to candles to the water. The biggest source of income, however, seemed to come from charging the Secret Service […]]]>

During the four years that Donald trump served as president, he swindled millions of taxpayer dollars by running official business at his properties, where the incarnate con artist made sure to charge everything from golf carts to candles to the water. The biggest source of income, however, seemed to come from charging the Secret Service to rent space at its own resorts; whether it was a weekend in Mar-a-Lago or a night in Bedminster, Trump, who claims to be “very rich”, never thought of letting the individuals protecting his life stay for free, instead forcing the government to fork out. much more money than what Eric Trump once claimed was “like $ 50” per night.

Given that former presidents receive Secret Service for life, and Trump did not suddenly stop being a crook when he stepped down, that arrangement obviously hasn’t changed – between January 20 and April 30, he billed Secret Service $ 40,011.15, a nice change since he couldn’t have billed the agency anything.

But Trump is not the only member of his family still costing taxpayers sky-high sums of money – his adult children, who are all a piece of the old block of con artists, are too.

The Washington post reports that thanks to the 45th President’s order, taken during his last days in office, to extend 24/7 security for six months to Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, Lara Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Tiffany Trump, and three former public servants, taxpayers have been forced to fork out over $ 1.7 million to protect a set of people who (1) have no role in government and (2) can afford to protect themselves. How do the charges break down? Let’s start with Princess Purses and the Prince of New Jersey boy:

One of the first payments made by the Secret Service was Trump’s own company. That day, according to records, Ivanka Trump and her family left Washington for Trump’s Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, where Ivanka Trump has a cottage on the grounds. Secret Service agents arrived and Trump’s club billed them for the rooms they were using.

The bill was $ 708.30 for one night, according to records. The rate appeared to be $ 141.66 per room, the same rate the club charged the Secret Service while Trump was still president. Over the next six months, the Secret Service spent an estimated $ 347,000 on plane tickets, hotels and rental cars while protecting Ivanka Trump and her husband, former White House adviser Jared Kushner, according to the records. . Receipts showed the couple were visiting resort destinations: Hawaii, the Utah ski region, an upscale Wyoming ranch, and Kiawah Island, SC

Agents also followed Kushner – now a private businessman – to the United Arab Emirates in May, paying $ 9,000 for hotel rooms, according to federal spending data released online. The secret services did not specify the price of the plane ticket for this Kushner trip. The Daily Beast reported that the hotel was the Ritz-Carlton in Abu Dhabi, citing a government spending document that said the hotel was Kushner’s choice.

In other words, taxpayers have partly footed the bill for Javanka’s vacation and for Kushner playing the role of a businessman. Spokesmen for the couple did not respond to the To postKushner’s requests for comment, but if they had, they might have explained why taxpayers are still funding Kushner and Ivanka’s security details when the duo have reportedly earned up to $ 640 million by working in the White House and can surely pay for such things out of their own pockets. (Another unanswered question: Do Kushner and Ivanka now let the Secret Service use their bathrooms, or do they always have to find a tree outside when nature calls them?)


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/surprise-ivanka-eric-and-donald-trump-jr-still-laugh-at-us-taxpayers/feed/ 0
Small business owners should see if they qualify for the home office deduction https://atoogratuit.com/small-business-owners-should-see-if-they-qualify-for-the-home-office-deduction/ https://atoogratuit.com/small-business-owners-should-see-if-they-qualify-for-the-home-office-deduction/#respond Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:53:37 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/small-business-owners-should-see-if-they-qualify-for-the-home-office-deduction/ Small business owners should see if they qualify for the home office deduction – BCTV Skip to content / Articles / Business and Economy / Many Americans have worked from home due to the pandemic, but only certain people will be eligible for the home office deduction. This deduction allows eligible taxpayers to deduct certain […]]]>

Small business owners should see if they qualify for the home office deduction – BCTV


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/small-business-owners-should-see-if-they-qualify-for-the-home-office-deduction/feed/ 0
Chiefs’ constituency offices charged taxpayers pennies for photocopies | national https://atoogratuit.com/chiefs-constituency-offices-charged-taxpayers-pennies-for-photocopies-national/ https://atoogratuit.com/chiefs-constituency-offices-charged-taxpayers-pennies-for-photocopies-national/#respond Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:55:38 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/chiefs-constituency-offices-charged-taxpayers-pennies-for-photocopies-national/ OTTAWA – As federal party leaders promise billions in new campaign spending, a glance at their office expense accounts shows what taxpayers are spending money on. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s office charged the taxpayer seven cents for photocopies, according to his MP’s expense reports. The office Trudeau heads as MP for Papineau in Montreal – […]]]>

OTTAWA – As federal party leaders promise billions in new campaign spending, a glance at their office expense accounts shows what taxpayers are spending money on.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s office charged the taxpayer seven cents for photocopies, according to his MP’s expense reports.

The office Trudeau heads as MP for Papineau in Montreal – not as prime minister – submitted the charge on his office expenses in March. He submitted another eight hundred “copy charge” last September.

The office of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who represents the riding of Burnaby South in British Columbia, demanded a cent from the taxpayer in July 2020, also for photocopying costs.

He submitted another expense of four cents in March 2021 and five cents in September 2020.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it was surprised politicians’ offices were being reimbursed out of public money for such small amounts – especially as families struggled to cope financially with a COVID pandemic.

“They think we’re not paying them enough?” “Asked Franco Terrazzano, federal director. “Do they need to take every last penny from taxpayers?”

Members are entitled to legitimate expenses incurred in the operation of their parliamentary and constituency offices. These expenses, classified as contracts, include the cost of rent and current expenses such as office supplies, cleaning products, advertising and photocopies.

There is no suggestion that the submissions from the Trudeau or Singh offices are inappropriate.

Spending also varies from MP to MP, which the House of Commons says may be related to the size or location of a given constituency. In the most recent quarter for which data is available, figures for the contracts category ranged from just under $ 84,000 to less than zero.

Brook Simpson, a spokesperson for the Liberal Party, said the seven and eight hundred charges were “related to Justin Trudeau’s work as a member of Parliament for Papineau, particularly the work done by staff in his office of constituency to serve the inhabitants of Papineau ”.

“Under the House of Commons contract for the Constituency Office printer, Members of Parliament are allocated a certain number of pages. Mr. Trudeau’s office would have exceeded the allocation provided for in the House of Commons contract. . When the number of printed pages exceeded the contract allocation, there was an automatic expense on his budget, “he said.

In the past, Trudeau has said that as a Member of Parliament he has “full personal responsibility for the financial administration” of his office.

Staff at Singh’s office said his constituency office records all expenses paid by the taxpayer, down to the last penny. This includes the cost of photocopying and faxing the House of Commons photocopier and fax machine they use in their constituency office.

A review of the top three party leaders’ office expense claims over the past fiscal year shows that Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole’s office submitted two claims for $ 12.90 in 2020 for a learning site for the French language, which allows subscribers to listen to news in slow French. Students can speed up as their French improves.

O’Toole made no secret of the fact that he was working on improving his French skills.

The expenses, which are posted on the House of Commons website, were made by the offices that the party leaders ran as constituency MPs. They had other functions as Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the NDP.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published on September 16, 2021.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/chiefs-constituency-offices-charged-taxpayers-pennies-for-photocopies-national/feed/ 0
Moderna, BioNTech and Pfizer cash in on taxpayer investments https://atoogratuit.com/moderna-biontech-and-pfizer-cash-in-on-taxpayer-investments/ https://atoogratuit.com/moderna-biontech-and-pfizer-cash-in-on-taxpayer-investments/#respond Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:46:30 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/moderna-biontech-and-pfizer-cash-in-on-taxpayer-investments/ Moderna, BioNTech and Pfizer reap astronomical and unreasonable profits from their monopolies on COVID mRNA vaccines – up to a 69% profit margin in the case of Moderna and BioNTech – while Moderna and Pfizer also pay little tax , activists from the People’s Vaccine Alliance said today. Through their patent monopolies for effective coronavirus […]]]>

Moderna, BioNTech and Pfizer reap astronomical and unreasonable profits from their monopolies on COVID mRNA vaccines – up to a 69% profit margin in the case of Moderna and BioNTech – while Moderna and Pfizer also pay little tax , activists from the People’s Vaccine Alliance said today.

Through their patent monopolies for effective coronavirus vaccines, the development of which has been supported by $ 100 billion in public funding from taxpayers in the United States, Germany and other countries, the three companies have made more than $ 26 billion. dollars in revenue in the first half of the year, at least two-thirds of pure profit in the case of Moderna and BioNTech. The Alliance also believes that the three companies are charging too much, with vaccine prices going up to $ 41 billion above the estimated cost of production.

“Big Pharma’s business model – receiving billions in public investment, charging sky-high prices for life-saving drugs, paying few taxes – is gold dust to wealthy investors and corporate executives, but devastating to global public health, ”said Robbie Silverman, private sector, Oxfam America. Head of recruitment. “Instead of partnering with governments and other qualified manufacturers to make sure we have enough doses of vaccine for everyone, these drug companies prioritize their own profits by enforcing their monopolies and selling To the best offer. Enough is enough, we need to start putting people before profits.

Even as large areas of the world experience rapid increases in COVID cases and deaths, Pfizer / BioNTech and Moderna have sold over 90% of their vaccines to wealthy countries, charging up to 24 times the potential cost of production, according to an Alliance analysis based on the work of MRNA scientists at Imperial College. Analysis of production techniques for the main mRNA-type vaccines produced by Pfizer / BioNTech and Moderna, which were only developed with public funding to the tune of $ 8.3 billion, suggests that these vaccines could be manufactured. for as little as $ 1.20 a dose.

Moreover, despite having benefited from 8.3 billion dollars of public investment in the development of their vaccines, American companies have not paid their fair share of taxes. In the first half of 2021, Moderna paid a US tax rate of 7% and Pfizer a 15% tax rate, well below the US statutory rate of 21%. The low tax rates paid by these American corporations indicate a failing and dysfunctional tax system that allows corporations earning billions of dollars to pay a significantly lower tax rate than working families in the United States. BioNTech, a German startup that produced the recipe for the Pfizer vaccine, paid a significantly higher tax rate of 31% in Germany while making a profit margin of 77%.

“More than 200 million people have been infected during this pandemic, more than 4.5 million people have died and at least nine new billionaires have been stricken thanks to COVID,” said Dinah Fuentesfina, campaign manager at ActionAid International. “It really is the inequality virus. We are creating vaccine billionaires but failing to immunize the billions of people who desperately need it. Given the vast public investment in the development of these vaccines and the needs of overwhelming public health across the globe, these life-saving vaccines must be global public goods. ”

As UNGA and a virtual COVID summit planned by President Biden approach, activists are mobilizing across the world, including in the United States, United Kingdom, Brazil, Germany, South Africa. South and India, to demand the lifting of monopolies on vaccines and immediate sharing of vaccine revenues to save lives. They were joined by more than 140 former leaders and Nobel laureates, including Francois Hollande, Helen Clarke and Gordon Brown, who wrote an open letter to German candidates ahead of the September 26 national election calling on them to overthrow the German opposition. waiving patents and supporting the immediate transfer of vaccine technology to manufacturers in developing countries.

Based on recently released second quarter financial data, the People’s Vaccine Alliance estimates that Moderna generated more than $ 6 billion in revenue this year, including $ 4.3 billion in profit, an astronomical profit margin of 69% on his vaccines. Moderna projects total vaccine sales of $ 20 billion in 2021. At the same time, Moderna pays single-digit tax rates – it only paid $ 322 million in taxes in 2021 despite billions of dollars. profits.

Since Moderna and BioNTech do not have other significant commercial products other than COVID-19 vaccines, the total profit margins are almost exclusively the result of vaccines. Although Pfizer is not a start-up and sells several products, the COVID vaccine has also been a huge boon for Pfizer.

The COVID vaccine now represents more than a third of Pfizer’s global revenue base. Pfizer sold more than $ 11 billion worth of vaccines in the first half of this year. Pfizer is now forecasting $ 33.5 billion in total vaccine sales for 2021, making the vaccine one of the best-selling pharmaceuticals this year and potentially in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. Pfizer has said its profit margins on vaccines are less than 30 percent, but because Pfizer only provides financial information for vaccine revenue, not expenses, it is not possible to independently verify its margins. beneficiaries. It only sold 0.5% of its vaccine doses to the poorest countries.

“The hoarding of vaccines by rich countries and the profits of rich pharmaceutical companies when millions of people around the world are denied protection are not only morally wrong, but also short-sighted and dangerous,” said Silverman. “As the Delta variant clearly demonstrates, if COVID is not controlled in other parts of the world, a mutation can lead to widespread transmission of the virus and serious illness or death among those who are not vaccinated. Future variations could send us back to square one. To truly bring this virus under control, we need to end the monopolies on vaccines, share the recipe, increase production globally, and vaccinate as many people as possible as quickly as possible. “

Administering additional boosters in wealthy countries like the US, UK and other countries, while poor countries languish far behind, will likely further increase the benefits and further increase the risk of vaccine-resistant variants. .

“Rich countries buying more doses to give third injections to their residents while most countries struggle to provide the first doses to their doctors and nurses illustrates the fundamental inequality that has prevailed in our response to COVID until now, ”said Maaza Seyoum of the African Alliance. and the Popular Alliance for Vaccines in Africa. “This uneven status quo is causing needless deaths around the world and producing new variants that threaten public health everywhere, all to fatten the portfolios of Big Pharma executives and corporate investors.”

“These companies have maximized their income and profits by preventing others from producing the vaccines and minimizing the taxes they pay,” Silverman concluded. “We need a popular vaccine, which means sharing the vaccine recipe, leveraging the world’s full manufacturing capacity, and producing enough doses for everyone. No one will be safe until everyone is safe. “

/ Public distribution. This material is from the original organization and may be ad hoc in nature, edited for clarity, style and length.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/moderna-biontech-and-pfizer-cash-in-on-taxpayer-investments/feed/ 0
State officials meet with school district over responsibility for FRG’s premature roof failure https://atoogratuit.com/state-officials-meet-with-school-district-over-responsibility-for-frgs-premature-roof-failure/ https://atoogratuit.com/state-officials-meet-with-school-district-over-responsibility-for-frgs-premature-roof-failure/#respond Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:00:00 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/state-officials-meet-with-school-district-over-responsibility-for-frgs-premature-roof-failure/ “There was no one from the past,” said State Senator Joseph A. Griffo, R-47, Rome, whose district includes the City of Rome School District and its taxpayers. “And that was my assertion,” Griffo continued. “Responsibility.” Griffo, along with MP Marianne Buttenschon, D-119, Marcy, met with school district members and their advisers last week at the […]]]>

“There was no one from the past,” said State Senator Joseph A. Griffo, R-47, Rome, whose district includes the City of Rome School District and its taxpayers. “And that was my assertion,” Griffo continued. “Responsibility.”

Griffo, along with MP Marianne Buttenschon, D-119, Marcy, met with school district members and their advisers last week at the Rome Free Academy – where lawmakers saw firsthand the impact of a failure premature from the roof of the FRG – less than 20 years after voters and taxpayers learned they were investing in a state-of-the-art, $ 42 million high school.

In addition to Griffo and Buttenschon, the meeting was attended by RCSD School Director Peter C. Blake; Robert Mezza, assistant superintendent of operations and management; John Nash, Chairman of the Board of Education; Alex Rodriguez, Director of Facilities; representatives from LaBella Associates, the neighborhood architect, as well as neighborhood building managers and tax advisers. Also in attendance were State Department of Education Assistant Commissioner Christina Coughlin, as well as architects and engineers from SED; Deputy State Comptroller Elliott Auerbach and a senior team comprising the Deputy Comptroller and Deputy Examiner; with John Maas, director of the central New York region of the state attorney general’s office.

“We think there should be accountability, especially given the large amount of taxpayer money that was used to complete this project (the new RFA building),” Griffo said. “It is important that we get everyone together to discuss, determine and verify what can be done to resolve this issue. “

“It is important to have all parties at the table,” Buttenschon added, “to consider what steps have been taken in the past and what planning is being carried out to ensure that taxpayers, parents, students and the school community are informed “.

“The group just had a conversation about the history of the new RFA building and specific concerns regarding the design and construction of 20 years ago,” said Blake.

While current district architect LaBella Associates was in attendance on Tuesday, they did not work on the RFA project. Absent from the room were representatives from Montgomery, Watson and Harza, a Utica-based structural engineering company (no longer in operation) and New York-based SBLM Architects, the company hired by the district to design the new RFA. No representative of these companies was present at the meeting.

During the May 6, 2021 regular meeting of the Board of Education in Rome, Facilities Director Alex Rodriguez – who was present last Tuesday – responded to the Board’s questions regarding the costs of repairs that the roof of the RFA was in “total failure”.

Responding to questions about how the roof could fail so quickly and completely, Rodriguez, at the time, said he believed the design flaws were contributing to the problem and argued that the problems started with the section of the roof above the pool, where he shared he believed the insulation was not installed properly. He explained that the open cell insulation was used instead of the closed cell insulation that should have been used due to the predicted humidity that would be present in this pool. He also explained that perforated decking had been installed, a type that allowed moisture to be absorbed into the insulation. Saturated insulation in this area caused moisture to spread to other areas of the roof membrane, impacting the joints that secure it to the building. Questions left to members were whether Rodriguez was right in his assessment and, if so, who would have been responsible for making those unfortunate decisions that left the check for the replacement of a less than 20 year old roof on the taxpayer table. from Rome and New York State.

Blake, during the same meeting, called the issue of the high school roof a “disaster”.

While contractors who worked on RFA’s new construction refer to a 19-year-old roof as having been installed “a long time ago,” an article in The Rome Sentinel, dated February 22, 2017, reports on a investigation of the condition of the installations. conducted by the District of Rome every five years to anticipate needs and budget accordingly. Survey results presented in early 2017 predicted expected costs for the 2020-21 school year. He identified nearly $ 8 million in needed repairs to the “state-of-the-art” high school and specified that “a roofing project should be considered for the roof of the pool and other areas. . In addition, the flashing should be treated in an area that has experienced leaks.

At the time these faults in the roof were identified and, not repairs, but a recommended “roofing project” – and the culprit part of the roof was above the pool, where Rodriguez recently explained the possible moisture-related design flaws in this area – the RFA roof was less than 15 years old.

The district architect, who oversaw this investigation, was also not LaBella, but March Associates.

Griffo shared that during Tuesday’s meeting, district officials revealed that a settlement agreement had been reached between the district and at least one contractor involved in the RFA project. He shared that he remembered it was an issue raised around construction or materials.

“We weren’t aware of this deal before,” Griffo said, “and if they made the right decision then, I don’t know? “

But Griffo didn’t walk away from Tuesday’s conversation, convinced there was no accountability to be attributed to the taxpayers who invested in the legendary high school in Rome, NY.

Griffo revealed that his concern with the issue predates his tenure in the New York State Senate. He is a native of Rome and, during the new construction of FRG, he was mayor of the city.

“Obviously the school district is a separate entity so I wouldn’t have been aware of the details,” Griffo said. “But we worked together and remained aware of their efforts.”

Griffo recalled that a proposal had been made to the people of Rome before building a new high school, and was rejected. But the district backed down under Superintendent Fran Murphy at the turn of the century and convinced taxpayers to invest in building a new multi-million dollar school.

“There has to be a lesson learned here,” Griffo said. “When we do these things, they have to be done with taxpayers in mind. “

Next steps

Griffo shared that attendants left with take-out tasks. The district promised to provide detailed information on the companies and contractors collaborating on the new construction of RFA. The regional attorney general’s office will endeavor to determine whether there are grounds for prosecution.

Griffo recalls that local and New York State taxes were spent on the RFA project.

“How does this happen? Griffo said. “We cannot continue to just accept things. We need to determine what and how it happened. There has to be a responsibility. “

Griffo expressed concern that some of the contractors involved in the RFA project may currently be engaged in other work funded by taxpayer dollars.

“If there are any entrepreneurs or companies that have worked on this and have stepped away from responsibility – but are still doing business in New York state,” Griffo said. “People deserve to know who they are.

Griffo concluded: “People deserve better.”

MEP Buttenschon offered that assurance of lawmakers’ visit to Rome and the ground she hoped everyone at Tuesday’s table shared in common.

“Quality education continues to be our priority.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/state-officials-meet-with-school-district-over-responsibility-for-frgs-premature-roof-failure/feed/ 0
Asset Declaration Order: Taxpayers Making Payment for One-Time Opportunity: FBR https://atoogratuit.com/asset-declaration-order-taxpayers-making-payment-for-one-time-opportunity-fbr/ https://atoogratuit.com/asset-declaration-order-taxpayers-making-payment-for-one-time-opportunity-fbr/#respond Sat, 11 Sep 2021 00:14:19 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/asset-declaration-order-taxpayers-making-payment-for-one-time-opportunity-fbr/ ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Council (FBR) has decided to grant a unique opportunity to taxpayers who have paid their tax on time, i.e. on July 3, 2019 under the Ordinance on the Declaration of heritage-2019 but could not file their returns due to any reason. In this regard, the FBR issued Circular 6 of 2021, […]]]>

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Council (FBR) has decided to grant a unique opportunity to taxpayers who have paid their tax on time, i.e. on July 3, 2019 under the Ordinance on the Declaration of heritage-2019 but could not file their returns due to any reason.

In this regard, the FBR issued Circular 6 of 2021, here Friday to grant relaxation in the filing of declarations under the Declaration of Assets Order-2019

According to the circular, the FBR decided to grant a unique opportunity to taxpayers who have paid their tax under the Declarations of Assets Ordinance-2019 but who have not been able, in one way or another other, file their statements.

The Ordinance on the Declaration of Assets, 2019 was promulgated on May 14, 2019 for the payment of tax and the declaration of the corresponding assets before June 30, 2019.

The deadline has been extended to July 3, 2019.

Aware of the difficulties caused and to facilitate the injured citizen taxpayers, the FBR decided to allow the filing of returns for all citizen taxpayers / persons who filed the tax under the ordinance on time, namely on 3 July 2019, but were unable to file their returns for any reason.

The system has been activated for this purpose and all taxpayers can now file their returns between September 10, 2021 and September 25, 2021.

FBR wants to change the rules for declaring assets

This is a special exemption granted under Section 7 of the Federal Board of Revenue Act, 2007, the RBF added.

When contacted, a tax expert said the circular was issued in accordance with instructions from the President and the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO).

President Dr Arif Alvi called on the FBR to take action to resolve the issue of filing returns by aggrieved persons, who have filed billions of rupees in taxes under the Tax Amnesty Scheme (Declaration Program of ‘active).

In this regard, the President upheld the FTO order and ruled on the appeals / representations brought by the FBR against the historic order issued by the FTO.

The President cited Article 17 of the Declaring Assets Ordinance under which the federal government can resolve the matter and remove the difficulties.

Despite the fact that tax filers deposited billions of rupees two years ago, the RBF has not settled the taxpayer issue, the president added.

The FTO had ordered the RBF to facilitate the filing of declarations by thousands of taxpayers under the Amnesty Regime (Assets Declaration Ordinance 2019), who have deposited billions of rupees in taxes, but have not were able to download their statements on the last date, that is to say July 3. 2019 due to a failure of the RBF computer system.

In this regard, the FTO had issued a landmark judgment (0011 / OM / 2020) to grant compensation to injured persons benefiting from the amnesty regime. The FTO recommended that the FBR make arrangements and facilitate the filing of returns in respect of all injured parties by invoking the provisions of Article 17 of the Income Tax Ordinance; update the RBF IT system, which requires extensive review and effective improvement, and report compliance within 45 days.

The FTO on its own initiative and on various amnesty declarations petitions represented by the Pakistan Tax Bar Association, which filed the taxes due to avail itself of the amnesty program but was unable to file the declarations in accordance with the law due to the failure of the FBR IRIS computer system on the last date of amnesty Declaration 2019, such as July 3, 2019, declared the inefficiency, incompetence of FBR officials, while designing the computer system for meet the needs of the public availing itself of the 2019 Amnesty Declaration Order.

According to the findings of the FTO, the inefficiency, negligence and incompetence of the officials of the department in designing the system by making the adequate arrangements and non-compliance with the provisions of the ordinance constitute maladministration within the meaning of the Article 2 (3) (ii) of the FTO Ordinance 2000.

Sacred nature of asset declarations

The FTO order issued here on Thursday revealed that an ex officio investigation had been initiated in the exercise of powers under Section 9 (1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 (FTO ordinance) on the complaint of delegation of agents. Pakistan Tax Bar Association (PTBA) to the FTO, alleging that thousands of taxpayers / people who intended to benefit from the amnesty program, promulgated by the government of Pakistan, as an ordinance on the declaration of assets, 2019 (the ordinance) filed billions of rupees in tax but were unable to upload the declaration of assets, as of the latest date, 03.07.2019, due to a system failure IT department (Dept).

The ministry had not anticipated this situation, where the generation of the CPR should have been subjected to the uploading of declarations. In this situation, no such anomaly would have arisen, as thousands of tax filers who paid billions of rupees in taxes were misled. Again, the seriousness of the situation had not been assessed because the tax so filed was not refundable or adjustable, FTO said.

The Ministry’s emphasis that the tax payable on the return was not the requirement of the order appears to be vague.

It was the ministry’s responsibility to keep the system running smoothly until the last minute, but unfortunately it did not meet the needs of reporters.

The general public had suffered from inadequate arrangements made by the RBF to cope with the expected load on its system.

The department has not ensured the proper functioning of its computer system to facilitate future declarants, to take advantage of the amnesty system by downloading their declarations on the last date.

It is therefore incompetence and ineffectiveness.

From officials of the RBF, said the FTO.

The record shows that thousands of tax filers have paid taxes of 2.6 billion rupees until 03.07.2019. Almost a year has passed, but the Department has taken no action to address their grievances. The ministry was well aware of the failure of the system to give effect to the regime.

Therefore, it was imperative that Commerce remove this difficulty / anomaly by invoking the provisions of Section 17 of the Ordinance. In light of the above mentioned discussion; inefficiency, negligence and incompetence on the part of RBF officials are established, the FTO order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/asset-declaration-order-taxpayers-making-payment-for-one-time-opportunity-fbr/feed/ 0
Ogemaw County Sheriff wants taxpayers to foot the bill for the law firm he hired https://atoogratuit.com/ogemaw-county-sheriff-wants-taxpayers-to-foot-the-bill-for-the-law-firm-he-hired/ https://atoogratuit.com/ogemaw-county-sheriff-wants-taxpayers-to-foot-the-bill-for-the-law-firm-he-hired/#respond Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:07:00 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/ogemaw-county-sheriff-wants-taxpayers-to-foot-the-bill-for-the-law-firm-he-hired/ OGEMAW COUNTY, Michigan (WJRT) – The latest news on the growing tension between the Ogemaw County Sheriff and the County Council of Commissioners. The sheriff is asking county taxpayers to pay a legal bill after hiring his own law firm. The county has its own legal advisor, but Sheriff Brian Gilbert disagreed with an internal […]]]>

OGEMAW COUNTY, Michigan (WJRT) – The latest news on the growing tension between the Ogemaw County Sheriff and the County Council of Commissioners.

The sheriff is asking county taxpayers to pay a legal bill after hiring his own law firm.

The county has its own legal advisor, but Sheriff Brian Gilbert disagreed with an internal investigation by the county prosecutor following an article on ABC 12 News. A federal lawsuit has also been filed against the county. The sheriff has hired his own law firm and expects taxpayers to foot the bill.

The county is being sued, partly for allegations against some MPs in our history and a federal lawsuit, the board cut funding for a vacant sergeant position, and now there’s another issue that’s causing trouble. . Gilbert wants the county council to approve the payment of a $ 3,700 bill from a law firm he hired, despite a county council policy that states that all outside legal work must be approved by the advice in advance.

“The sheriff explained that he wanted to consult other lawyers simply because he did not really agree with the outcome of the investigation,” said county administrator Tim Dolehanty.

Gilbert was not satisfied with an investigation by Ogemaw County attorney Greg Meihn, who recommended that his own report on alleged past wrongdoing in the sheriff’s department be turned over to the attorney general’s office and the FBI.

Gilbert hired the law firm Abbott Nicholson, which sent him the bill, but apparently wanted to keep the legal work he did a secret, as it is largely redacted.

“We have dates, we know when the consultations were held, we know roughly the time spent, but we have no idea what these conversations were about,” says Dolehanty.

It is not clear how this legal bill will be paid.

We contacted the sheriff several times but had no response.

We also called and left a message at law firm Abbott Nicholson, but again the message was not returned.

Copyright 2021 WJRT. All rights reserved.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/ogemaw-county-sheriff-wants-taxpayers-to-foot-the-bill-for-the-law-firm-he-hired/feed/ 0
Williamson Co.’s Board of Directors Agreement with Walker’s Bluff Protects Taxpayers, President Says | Local News https://atoogratuit.com/williamson-co-s-board-of-directors-agreement-with-walkers-bluff-protects-taxpayers-president-says-local-news/ https://atoogratuit.com/williamson-co-s-board-of-directors-agreement-with-walkers-bluff-protects-taxpayers-president-says-local-news/#respond Fri, 03 Sep 2021 21:30:00 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/williamson-co-s-board-of-directors-agreement-with-walkers-bluff-protects-taxpayers-president-says-local-news/ A casino is planned for Walker’s Bluff. The photo of the south folder MARION – The Williamson County Board of Directors adopted a new host community agreement with Walker’s Bluff Casino Resort on Friday at a special meeting. Board chairman Jim Marlo said the most recent HCA protects county taxpayers from additional expenses in the […]]]>





A casino is planned for Walker’s Bluff.


The photo of the south folder


MARION – The Williamson County Board of Directors adopted a new host community agreement with Walker’s Bluff Casino Resort on Friday at a special meeting.

Board chairman Jim Marlo said the most recent HCA protects county taxpayers from additional expenses in the future related to the project.

Originally the plan was to build a temporary casino building and then permanent structures in phases. Instead, the new plan, announced in May, calls for the construction of a permanent building in a single phase.

Marlo said the new agreement eliminated information about a temporary building, but included terms that were unclear about the county’s responsibility for any new infrastructure beyond that agreed with the original casino project.

After speaking with Cynde Bunch and her partner Dan Kehl of Elite Casino Resorts, they agreed to add wording to a clause regarding future costs for roads to include utilities, water and sewage. Before this new deal could be passed, the board had to reverse the version approved on Monday, officials said.

The HCA sets out the details of the development of a casino complex and lists the parties involved in the development. It must be filed with the Illinois Gaming Commission before a permanent license can be granted. The original HCA for the project was adopted on June 8, 2020.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/williamson-co-s-board-of-directors-agreement-with-walkers-bluff-protects-taxpayers-president-says-local-news/feed/ 0
Little Mountain: Documents reveal developer bought property with $ 211 million taxpayer-funded loan – interest-free for 18 years https://atoogratuit.com/little-mountain-documents-reveal-developer-bought-property-with-211-million-taxpayer-funded-loan-interest-free-for-18-years/ https://atoogratuit.com/little-mountain-documents-reveal-developer-bought-property-with-211-million-taxpayer-funded-loan-interest-free-for-18-years/#respond Wed, 01 Sep 2021 01:17:13 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/little-mountain-documents-reveal-developer-bought-property-with-211-million-taxpayer-funded-loan-interest-free-for-18-years/ Breadcrumb Links New Local News The 2008 sale agreement between the former British Columbia Liberal government and Holborn Properties, which was finally released on Tuesday, also does not set a timeline for the replacement of demolished social housing. Author of the article: Dan Fumano Ingrid Steenhuisen at the Little Mountain property in Vancouver on August […]]]>

The 2008 sale agreement between the former British Columbia Liberal government and Holborn Properties, which was finally released on Tuesday, also does not set a timeline for the replacement of demolished social housing.

Content of the article

Thirteen years after the British Columbia government sold the Little Mountain social housing property to a private developer, new revelations about the controversial deal have sparked more public outrage.

Advertising

Content of the article

The full sale contract for the six-hectare site in Vancouver was first released on Tuesday, revealing that in 2008 the provincial government under the British Columbia Liberals granted the property buyer, Holborn. Properties, a $ 210.9 million mortgage, but it won’t start. interest accrued until 2026.

“Where did they get this money? They got it from us, the people of British Columbia. BC Housing provided the mortgage… 18 years, no interest payments, ”said David Chudnovsky, the retired NDP MP who secured the contract of sale this week through an access process. three and a half years information.

Holborn, a Vancouver-based development company owned by one of Malaysia’s richest families, has opposed Chudnovsky’s attempts to access the documents for years, but abandoned the effort last week.

Advertising

Content of the article

“If you, I, or any British Columbian got a loan to pay for a car, a house or a large piece of land, we would expect to start paying it back, with interest, right away,” Chudnovsky said. “But not Holborn. They can play by different rules. Rules set out in what was, until yesterday, a secret agreement.

David Chudnovsky, a former NDP MP, with the Little Mountain development site on Main Street at 36th Avenue in Vancouver.
David Chudnovsky, a former NDP MP, with the Little Mountain development site on Main Street at 36th Avenue in Vancouver.

In an emailed statement, Holborn spokeswoman Megan Schrader said that while the terms of the deal may seem “unusual” today, they reflect market conditions at the time.

“In 2008, when the deal was structured, we were in the midst of the deepest global recession since the Great Depression,” Schrader wrote. “The terms of the deal reflected the widespread economic uncertainty of the time and were seen as practical and reasonable solutions given the economic context.”

Advertising

Content of the article

Shirley Bond, interim leader of the British Columbia Liberals, admitted that the deal had not worked as expected.

The goal of the Little Mountain sale was to create more non-market housing, Bond wrote in an emailed statement, and “although the proceeds from the sale were used to develop over 2,100 new units of Supportive Housing across British Columbia, it is clear that the expected results have not been achieved to date.

“We need to understand why this lack of progress, which is far too common, has occurred and how we are making sure that all levels of government can improve to avoid significant delays,” Bond said.

Little Mountain has received a big backlash, but it’s not the only sale of public land to private interests that BC taxpayers should know more about, said Derek Holloway, who worked for BC Assessment for 28 years before retiring as Senior Evaluator in 2017.

Advertising

Content of the article

The province has sold several prime real estate properties in recent years. A 2019 Postmedia investigation found $ 1 billion in public land had been sold over a six-year period.

“There should be transparency around all of this public land that is being sold,” Holloway said. “We’re the salespeople… but we don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes. “

This week’s revelations raise more questions about Little Mountain, Holloway said, adding that he would like a public inquiry into the deal.

Ingrid Steenhuisen grew up in Little Mountain and lived there in 2007 when news broke of the province’s plan to sell and redevelop the property.

Children play at Little Mountain on January 2, 1971.
Children play at Little Mountain on January 2, 1971. Photo by Brian Kent /PNG

At that time, Steenhuisen and other residents spoke out against the demolition of its 224 homes, she recalled this week, and called for the redevelopment to be completed in phases, so as not to immediately move around 700 tenants, many of whom were seniors, people with disabilities and low-income families with children.

Advertising

Content of the article

When Holborn demolished Little Mountain in 2009, they destroyed more than buildings, Steenhuisen said Tuesday. “It was the wanton and deliberate destruction of a community… We were one big family.”

At the time of demolition, Steenhuisen said, residents of Little Mountain were confident they could move back into newly reconstructed social housing by the end of 2010.

In mid-August, a representative for the city of Vancouver said only 53 units of permanent non-market housing had been built on the site.

The city said Holborn was required to rebuild all pledged social housing before starting construction of planned market housing for the site. But Chudnovsky and others who reviewed the full sales contract released this week were shocked to find that the province had not set deadlines for the replacement of non-market housing.

Advertising

Content of the article

Another former Little Mountain resident, Jeannine Silvestrone, said: “How can you think these people are going to start building anytime if you don’t give them an end date? “

“These big mega-companies don’t have to hurry. They can afford to let it sit and increase its value, ”she said. “It is a crying shame.”

Documents from April 2008 show the total purchase price to be $ 333.9 million, and by that time Holborn had already paid $ 20 million, with a plan to pay an additional $ 10 million. by the end of 2012 and $ 5 million by mid-2013. Another $ 88 million would be in the form of a construction loan in Holborn to build 234 non-market housing units, which would be transferred back to BC Housing, to replace the 224 demolished units.

Advertising

Content of the article

The balance, $ 210.9 million, was to take the form of a repossession mortgage from the province’s seller, with no accrued interest until Dec.31, 2026.

Schrader, spokeswoman for Holborn, said the remaining balance of $ 210.9 million will be paid for from the proceeds of home sales in the market, and the arrangement was structured that way “to prioritize to the construction of social housing “.

“In payment structures for large land sales, it’s very common for the buyer to provide a deposit and pay the balance as the land is developed,” Schrader said. “The proceeds from the sale of Little Mountain provided immediate funding to the province, allowing it to reinvest that money in affordable housing projects. “

BC Housing posted the full records associated with the sales contract online on Friday afternoon.

Chudnovsky said he will continue to browse the materials and encourage others to do so as well.

dfumano@postmedia.com

twitter.com/fumano


Start your day with a roundup of British Columbia news and opinions delivered straight to your inbox at 7 a.m. Monday through Friday by signing up for our Sunrise newsletter here.


CLICK HERE to report a typo.

Is there more to this story? We would love to hear from you about this story or any story you think we should know about. Send an email to vanips@postmedia.com.

Advertising

comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil discussion forum and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour of moderation before appearing on the site. We ask that you keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, if there is an update to a comment thread that you follow, or if a user that you follow comments. Check out our community guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.



Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/little-mountain-documents-reveal-developer-bought-property-with-211-million-taxpayer-funded-loan-interest-free-for-18-years/feed/ 0
ITR Refund news: IT reimburses over 51,000 crore, but less than last year | India Business News https://atoogratuit.com/itr-refund-news-it-reimburses-over-51000-crore-but-less-than-last-year-india-business-news/ https://atoogratuit.com/itr-refund-news-it-reimburses-over-51000-crore-but-less-than-last-year-india-business-news/#respond Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:44:00 +0000 https://atoogratuit.com/itr-refund-news-it-reimburses-over-51000-crore-but-less-than-last-year-india-business-news/ NEW DELHI: The Income Tax Service said on Sunday it had refunded Rs 51,531 crore to nearly 23 lakh taxpayers between April and August 23, indicating a steep drop so far in the year . Between April and August 25, 2020, income tax refunds were paid to over 25.5 lakhs of taxpayers and totaled 95,853 […]]]>
NEW DELHI: The Income Tax Service said on Sunday it had refunded Rs 51,531 crore to nearly 23 lakh taxpayers between April and August 23, indicating a steep drop so far in the year .
Between April and August 25, 2020, income tax refunds were paid to over 25.5 lakhs of taxpayers and totaled 95,853 crore rupees. The government did not provide comparative data, but officials in the past blamed the tax portal’s problems on slower payments.
In a series of tweets, the ministry said that, so far, 93% of refund requests made in returns for the 2020-21 tax year (FY 2019-20) have been processed. “During the past week, refunds of over 15,269 crore rupees have been issued and will soon be credited to taxpayers,” he said.

Last year the government focused on refunds, which rose 42% to 2.6 crore rupees and were paid out to nearly 2.4 crore of taxpayers. “It can be noted that this included the accelerated refunds in a series of measures providing relief to taxpayers during the pandemic,” the income tax department tweeted on Sunday evening.
Authorities communicate with taxpayers for responses in cases where refunds have not been paid due to bank account adjustments, defaults or mismatch so that payment can be expedited. “The ministry is asking taxpayers to respond quickly online, so that ITRs (tax returns) in such YY 20-21 cases can be dealt with quickly. The ministry has also started processing RTI 1 and 4 for AY 2021-22 (FY2020-21) and refunds, if any, will be issued directly to the taxpayer’s bank account, ”he added.


Source link

]]>
https://atoogratuit.com/itr-refund-news-it-reimburses-over-51000-crore-but-less-than-last-year-india-business-news/feed/ 0