Democrats want to ignore the Hyde Amendment, use taxes for abortions.

0

For 45 years, members of Congress on both sides of the aisle as well as presidents of both parties have agreed that taxpayers should not fund abortions.

But under the pro-abortion leadership of the House and Senate, that has changed. Instead of protecting women and their unborn children, pro-abortion Democrats are more interested in polishing their credentials with abortion groups and their supporters.

And in order to do this, many Democratic Party leaders are more than willing to force taxpayers to pay for abortions on demand.

Congressman Henry Hyde, R-Ill., Introduced the Hyde Amendment in 1976, shortly after Supreme Court rulings in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton who legalized abortion on demand. At that time, federal Medicaid laws, written before Roe and Doe, made no reference to abortion, and the federal program was paying for 300,000 abortions each year – and the number was growing.

The Hyde Amendment is estimated to have saved more than 2.4 million lives – National Right to Life considers it the biggest abortion reduction measure ever passed by Congress.

It’s time to save Hyde and tell Congress, “Don’t hide the Hyde Amendment.

Each year, the Hyde Amendment is added to the annual health and social services appropriation bill to prevent taxpayer funds from being used to pay for abortions. The measure has enjoyed bipartisan support since its introduction in 1976 and has been in force since.

But to be continuously in effect, the Hyde Amendment must be added to the supply budget every year.

For the first time since 1976, the majority party’s proposed budget has no Hyde amendment language – a deliberate omission.

Until recently, the Hyde Amendment had the support of the Republican and Democratic presidents. However, in 2019 then-candidate Joe Biden reversed his stance on the amendment and announced that he supported taxpayer funding for abortion.

In fact, President Biden’s proposed budget for fiscal 2022 omitted the Hyde Amendment and made it clear that President Biden supports extremism from pro-abortion groups who would like on-demand abortion to be paid for with money. taxpayers.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer want to eliminate the Hyde Amendment and have repeatedly defended the decision to do so. Leading Democrats in the House and Senate are determined to fund abortions with taxpayer dollars.

What was once a bipartisan consensus – that taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortions – is now part of a global campaign to make abortion available anytime, anywhere, and for no. any reason – and paid with taxpayer money.

The abortion industry is powerful. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, brings in more than $ 1 billion a year. This powerful organization, along with its allies, views taxpayer dollars as another source of income, and Hyde’s elimination will dramatically increase their share of that money.

This is a grab of money, plain and simple, and the Democratic leadership is part of this campaign to pour more money into the abortion industry against the wishes of the American people.

Most Americans oppose using taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions. In a January 2021 Marist poll, 58% said they “oppose the use of taxpayer money to pay for a woman’s abortion,” and a November 2020 McLaughlin poll estimated the number of people opposed to 64%.

But the will of the people does not matter to Democratic leaders when they are fully engaged in a scorched earth campaign against unborn children and want to use their tax dollars to pay it off.

South Dakota Right to Life asks you to join us in encouraging our Congressional delegation – Senator Thune, Senator Rounds and Representative Johnson – to stand firm and insist that the Hyde Amendment be added to the supply budget of this year. . In other words, don’t hide the Hyde Amendment.

Dale Bartscher of Rapid City is the Executive Director of South Dakota Right to Life.


Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.